8
BUILD MANITOBA     winnipegconstruction.ca
Manitoba’s construction industry supports the goals 
of workforce development, apprenticeship growth and 
inclusive hiring. We always have. But the Manitoba Jobs 
Agreement (MJA) – which the Kinew government began 
applying to public projects over $50 million in 2025 – is 
not the right tool to achieve them. It is a project labour 
agreement that restricts competition, overrides worker 
choice and directs public dollars to organizations workers 
never chose to support.
The costs that concern us most are not wages or standard 
worker benefits – open shop contractors across Manitoba 
already provide competitive health and benefit plans to 
their employees. What we object to are the additional levies 
that flow not to workers, but to union organizations. Chief 
among them: a mandatory $0.85-per-hour charge on every 
in-scope hour worked, paid directly to the Building Trades 
Bargaining Council (BTBC). This is not a worker benefit. It 
funds the BTBC’s own activities.
On top of the BTBC remittance, non-union workers are 
required under Article 10.2 of the MJA to pay an amount 
equal to full union dues as a condition of working on the 
project – even though they never joined a union and never 
voted for one. These amounts are deducted from their 
paycheques and remitted to the unions. Workers have no 
say, no opt-out and no recourse. This is compelled financial 
support for an organization the worker did not choose.
Beyond the financial burden, the MJA structurally 
disadvantages non-union contractors from the moment 
they bid. Union-affiliated workers receive preferential hiring 
status under Article 20.3.2. More troubling still, Article 20.5.2 
grants an affiliate local union the power – at its “absolute 
discretion” – to evaluate and reject non-union employees 
before those workers set foot on site. This introduces too 
much labour risk for an open shop contractor.
WHAT WE ARE CALLING FOR
The WCA Board of Directors has called on the province 
to re-engage industry in a principles-based process – 
FROM OUR DIRECTOR 
OF STAKEHOLDER 
ENGAGEMENT  
AND ADVOCACY
The Manitoba Jobs Agreement: Who Is It Really Working For?
one that achieves workforce and inclusion goals without 
imposing a specific labour system. We have proposed eight 
targeted amendments: eliminate compelled payments to 
unions from non-union workers and contractors; replace 
union-controlled hiring preferences with competency and 
Manitoba residency as the sole basis for staffing; prohibit 
unions from gatekeeping non-union workforces; ban project 
bundling as a mechanism to trigger MJA applicability; 
strengthen worker privacy protections; and require an 
independent public review – tabled in the Legislature – 
before the MJA is extended to any new project.
THIS IS ABOUT ALL OF MANITOBA
Manitoba’s construction industry is diverse, highly capable 
and deeply committed to building this province well. Our 
members – union and non-union alike – want to work 
on public projects. They want to train apprentices, hire 
inclusively and deliver on time and on budget. The MJA, as 
currently structured, makes that harder, not easier.
Good public infrastructure policy unites the industry. 
The MJA divides it. We are calling on Premier Kinew’s 
government to come back to the table – not to abandon 
its goals, but to pursue them in a way that works for every 
qualified Manitoban who wants to build.
 
Darryl Harrison
The WCA’s full position statement and eight proposed 
amendments are available at winnipegconstruction.ca.

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.